Search by

Latest News

The 2021-22 CDPP Annual Report was tabled in Parliament on Friday 28 October 20

The CDPP recently received an overall satisfaction score of 86 per cent from its biennial 2022 Partner Agency Survey.

The CDPP's 2022-26 Corporate Plan is now available.

The Attorney-General of New South Wales today announced the appointment of Ms Sarah McNaughton SC as a judge of the Supreme Court of NSW. 

The CDPP’s Library and Research Services team has won the 2022 Legal Information Service of the Year award announced at the Australian Law Librarians’ Association (ALLA) conference in Hobart on Thursday 26 August.

On 7 July 2022 the Commonwealth Attorney-General, the Honourable Mark Dreyfus QC MP, announced he had declined to proceed further in the prosecution of Mr Bernard Collaery for five offences relating to the alleged unlawful communication of ASIS information contrary to the Intelligence Services

On 11 February 2022, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Ms Sarah McNaughton SC announced her decision to decline to proceed further in the criminal prosecutions of Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited, Deutsche Bank AG and four senior banking executives for cartel offences

The CDPP 2020-21 Annual Report was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday 20 October 2021. 

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Sarah McNaughton SC, has been extended in the role for a further two years.

The CDPP has launched a new Partner Agency Portal, giving investigators from partner agencies easy and timely access to information.
The last 12 months has tested businesses, including the CDPP, to become more agile to effectively deliver services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) is an independent prosecution service established by Parliament under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) to prosecute alleged offences against Commonwealth law.

The Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is warning members of the community to beware of scammers claiming to be from the CDPP.
The CDPP’s Partner Agencies will soon have access to a refreshed, scalable and dynamic, secure website to support their investigative work.

This is a joint media release between the Australian Federal Police and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

A 24-year-old Sydney man has been jailed for nine years and four months after he posed as a teen to exploit and extort explicit images from children online.

Note: This is a joint media release between the Australian Federal Police and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

A serial paedophile who abused children in Australia and Southeast Asia has today been sentenced to 35 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 28 years.

On 7 November 2019, Richard Ham (21) and Soo Lee (24) were sentenced in the District Court of New South Wales after pleading guilty to attempting to possess a commercial quantity of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), more commonly known as ‘ecstasy’.

Today, Perth woman Alesha Stopforth (30) was sentenced in the District Court of Western Australia to 3 years imprisonment, to be released after serving 16 months upon entering into a Recognisance Order in the amount of $10,000 and to be of good behaviour for a period of 20 months, after pleading

Suzanne Akkari (25) was today sentenced to 18 months imprisonment to be released forthwith on a recognisance of $500 and to be of good behaviour for 18 months, after pleading guilty to a charge of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another in the arrangement of a marriage to obtain perman

Today*, Savas Avan (49) was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to 3 years imprisonment, after pleading guilty to mailing packages containing asbestos to consulates and embassies in Melbourne and Canberra.

Today, Luke Borg (36) was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria after pleading guilty to a number of child sex offences.

A man from Sydney was today sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 34 years, with a non-parole period of 29 years, for preparing and planning a terrorist attack, threatening to kill the NSW Commissioner of Corrective Services and for an attack on an inmate in custody.

Three Victorian men were today sentenced in the Supreme Court of Victoria for the offence of engaging in a terrorist act.  A jury had earlier found the men guilty of this crime by setting fire to a Shia mosque in suburban Melbourne, causing $1.5 million in damage.

The Victorian County Court has today sentenced Mohamed Osman Omar (36), to four years imprisonment, after he pleaded guilty to defrauding the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) of more than $370,000, and attempting to obtain a further amount of more than $85,000.

Court of Appeal dismissed appeal in MDMA case


Name: Jan Visser

Date of Judgment: 18 December2020

Court (e.g. District Court of NSW; Court of Appeal – Victoria): Court of Appeal – Victoria

Partner Agency: Australian Federal Police

Summary of charges:

Mr Jan Visser was charged with one count of conspiracy to possess a commercial quantity of an unlawfully imported border-controlled drug, contrary to ss 11.5 and 307.5 of the Criminal Code (Cth).


Operation Bootham-Moko was an investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) into the 2007 importation of a border-controlled drug. Investigators discovered 1.4 tonnes of pure MDMA concealed in tomato tins in a shipping container in Melbourne.  At that time, this was said to be the world’s largest ecstasy seizure. Eight men, including Mr Visser, were arrested and charged with offences relating to the “tomato tins consignment”.

In July 2014, a jury found Mr Visser guilty of conspiring to possess the MDMA.  He was sentenced to 11 years’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of eight years. An appeal brought by Mr Visser against his conviction and sentence was dismissed by the Victorian Court of Appeal in 2015.

In September 2016, Mr Visser lodged a petition for mercy with the Commonwealth Attorney- General.  At the time, that petition was based on what was said to be fresh evidence obtained from two of Mr Visser’s co-offenders. In 2019, having received disclosure from the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) outlining  the role played by Ms Nicola Gobbo as a Victoria Police informer, Mr Visser expanded his petition to make allegations about the impact Ms Gobbo’s conduct might have had on his trial.  In particular, Mr Visser pointed to evidence that, whilst appearing as counsel in the trial of a co-accused on an unrelated matter, Ms Gobbo had received and provided to Victoria Police a bill of lading shipping document which ultimately resulted in the seizure of the MDMA concealed in the “tomato tins consignment”. 

In November 2019 the Commonwealth Attorney-General referred the whole of Mr Visser’s case to the Court of Appeal to be heard and determined as if it were a fresh appeal.

On 18 December 2020, the Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Visser’s appeal.

Key points:

The first ground of Mr Visser’s appeal alleged a miscarriage of justice based on the failure of the CDPP and the AFP to disclose Ms Gobbo’s status as a registered informer and her role in obtaining the bill of lading shipping document which resulted in the seizure of the MDMA. 

The second ground of appeal ground alleged the prosecution was malicious and an abuse of process because the CDPP and the AFP knew Ms Gobbo was a registered police informer who was informing on her clients.

The third ground of appeal was based on the fresh evidence which had been obtained from two co-offenders and which suggested that Mr Visser had not aware that the “tomato tins consignment” contained drugs.


Mr Visser’s appeal was dismissed.

In regards to Mr Visser’s first two ground of appeal, the Court found there was no failure by the CDPP or the AFP to comply with their disclosure obligations at trial.  The unchallenged evidence established that at no time prior to, or at the time of Mr Visser’s trial, were any of the AFP or CDPP officers (or counsel briefed by the CDPP) responsible for the prosecution of Mr Visser’s case aware of Ms Gobbo’s status as a Victoria Police informer.  Such matters were therefore not capable of being disclosed to Mr Visser at that time.  In addition, this evidence provided no factual basis for characterising the prosecution of Mr Visser as malicious.   

The Court also found that disclosure of that fact that Ms Gobbo had provided information to Victoria Police resulting in the detection of the “tomato tins consignment” would not have resulted in this evidence being excluded at Mr Visser’s trial.  The Court found that the bill of lading had not been improperly obtained by Victoria Police and that no legal professional privilege attached to this document. This document had not been brought into existence for the purpose of obtaining legal advice.  To the contrary, the document had been provided to Ms Gobbo for safekeeping and in furtherance of an illegal purpose – namely the ongoing criminal activity of importing the MDMA.  Furthermore, the Court also found that even if the bill of lading did attract legal professional privilege or its provision to Victoria Police did infringe some duty of loyalty or confidence, there was no prospect that the evidence of the detection of the “tomato tins consignment” and the MDMA would not have been admitted into evidence.  The evidence was reliable and highly probative.  The crime alleged to have been committed by Mr Visser was an extremely serious one and the non-disclosure of the source of the bill of lading was not deliberate.  Under s 138(3) of the Evidence Act, these factors would have weighed heavily in favour of admitting the evidence.

Finally, regarding the fresh evidence on which Mr Visser sought to rely, the Court ruled that there was no significant possibility that the jury, acting reasonably, would have acquitted Mr Visser, even if such evidence had been before it.

Relevant links:

Court of Appeal Decision