Search by

Latest News

The 2021-22 CDPP Annual Report was tabled in Parliament on Friday 28 October 20

The CDPP recently received an overall satisfaction score of 86 per cent from its biennial 2022 Partner Agency Survey.

The CDPP's 2022-26 Corporate Plan is now available.

The Attorney-General of New South Wales today announced the appointment of Ms Sarah McNaughton SC as a judge of the Supreme Court of NSW. 

The CDPP’s Library and Research Services team has won the 2022 Legal Information Service of the Year award announced at the Australian Law Librarians’ Association (ALLA) conference in Hobart on Thursday 26 August.

On 7 July 2022 the Commonwealth Attorney-General, the Honourable Mark Dreyfus QC MP, announced he had declined to proceed further in the prosecution of Mr Bernard Collaery for five offences relating to the alleged unlawful communication of ASIS information contrary to the Intelligence Services

On 11 February 2022, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Ms Sarah McNaughton SC announced her decision to decline to proceed further in the criminal prosecutions of Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited, Deutsche Bank AG and four senior banking executives for cartel offences

The CDPP 2020-21 Annual Report was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday 20 October 2021. 

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Sarah McNaughton SC, has been extended in the role for a further two years.

The CDPP has launched a new Partner Agency Portal, giving investigators from partner agencies easy and timely access to information.
The last 12 months has tested businesses, including the CDPP, to become more agile to effectively deliver services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) is an independent prosecution service established by Parliament under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) to prosecute alleged offences against Commonwealth law.

The Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is warning members of the community to beware of scammers claiming to be from the CDPP.
The CDPP’s Partner Agencies will soon have access to a refreshed, scalable and dynamic, secure website to support their investigative work.

This is a joint media release between the Australian Federal Police and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

A 24-year-old Sydney man has been jailed for nine years and four months after he posed as a teen to exploit and extort explicit images from children online.

Note: This is a joint media release between the Australian Federal Police and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

A serial paedophile who abused children in Australia and Southeast Asia has today been sentenced to 35 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 28 years.

On 7 November 2019, Richard Ham (21) and Soo Lee (24) were sentenced in the District Court of New South Wales after pleading guilty to attempting to possess a commercial quantity of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), more commonly known as ‘ecstasy’.

Today, Perth woman Alesha Stopforth (30) was sentenced in the District Court of Western Australia to 3 years imprisonment, to be released after serving 16 months upon entering into a Recognisance Order in the amount of $10,000 and to be of good behaviour for a period of 20 months, after pleading

Suzanne Akkari (25) was today sentenced to 18 months imprisonment to be released forthwith on a recognisance of $500 and to be of good behaviour for 18 months, after pleading guilty to a charge of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another in the arrangement of a marriage to obtain perman

Today*, Savas Avan (49) was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to 3 years imprisonment, after pleading guilty to mailing packages containing asbestos to consulates and embassies in Melbourne and Canberra.

Today, Luke Borg (36) was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria after pleading guilty to a number of child sex offences.

A man from Sydney was today sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 34 years, with a non-parole period of 29 years, for preparing and planning a terrorist attack, threatening to kill the NSW Commissioner of Corrective Services and for an attack on an inmate in custody.

Three Victorian men were today sentenced in the Supreme Court of Victoria for the offence of engaging in a terrorist act.  A jury had earlier found the men guilty of this crime by setting fire to a Shia mosque in suburban Melbourne, causing $1.5 million in damage.

The Victorian County Court has today sentenced Mohamed Osman Omar (36), to four years imprisonment, after he pleaded guilty to defrauding the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) of more than $370,000, and attempting to obtain a further amount of more than $85,000.

Hoax bomb threat a serious matter

New South Wales

Name: Sanjay Korat

Date of Judgment: 5 February 2021

Court: NSW District Court

Partner Agency: Australian Federal Police

Summary of charges:

Mr Sanjay Korat pleaded guilty to, and was sentenced for, the following offence:

  • 1 x Use carriage service for hoax threat, contrary to s474.16 of the Criminal Code (Cth).


The offender made two telephone calls from Newcastle, New South Wales – one to Mumbai International Airport Limited and the other to Singapore Airlines Ground Handling Agency in India. The purpose of the calls was to induce the false belief that an explosive had been left on a Singapore Airlines flight. The flight, at the time, had left Mumbai, India, and was mid-flight en route to Singapore.

The hoax bomb threat was treated with due seriousness including scrambling two F16C/D fighter jets to accompany the flight into Changi Airport in Singapore and security personnel subjecting the airplane and all cargo to additional security scanning upon landing.

Key points:

This case was a serious example of the offence provision of ‘use carriage service for hoax threat’ under s474.16 of the Criminal Code (Cth). Most of the cases prosecuted by the CDPP under this offence provision are prosecuted in the lower courts. The seriousness of this case led the CDPP to prosecuting this charge on indictment in the District Court.

The matter was assisted greatly by the AFP who worked closely with Singapore Airlines and the Singaporean Government and was able to obtain significant evidence through Mutual Assistance processes.

The outcome balances multiple stakeholder interests including the interests of accused persons with the need to protect the community and to deter similar offending from occurring in future. It also demonstrates the seriousness of hoax bomb threats in light of contemporary world events.


The sentence hearing in this matter spanned two days. The Crown’s ultimate submission was that the only appropriate sentence was a term of imprisonment with a period of full-time custody to serve. It was a complicated sentence hearing with limited comparatives for guidance and only one appellate authority identified in relation to the offence provision.

The presiding Judge afforded a 25% discount for the utilitarian value of the offender’s plea of guilty, and the offender was convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two years to commence from 4 February 2021, and to be released after serving one year in custody on a Recognizance Release Order pursuant to s20(1)(b) Crimes Act (Cth), in the sum of $5,000, with condition to be of good behaviour for a period of three years commencing on 3 February 2022.

During the lengthy hearing a number of medical reports were tendered by the representatives of the offender in relation to various alcohol addiction issues. The CDPP addressed the court’s questions regarding the application of self-induced intoxication to Commonwealth matters after it was suggested that the offender’s conduct may be mitigated by evidence, although limited and conflicting, that the offender may have been intoxicated during the time of his conduct.

There were certain factors accepted by the court that related to the offender’s potential hardship in custody, including the language and cultural difficulties likely to be faced coming from India, and his limited family presence in Australia.

The presiding judge determined that this offender’s conduct was objectively more serious than all other cases listed in the comparative cases filed by the Crown. This finding was largely due to the impact of the threat, and His Honour took judicial notice of the economic, logistical and personal toll of the offender’s conduct. Of note His Honour found that the passenger announcement that was made onboard the flight to alert all passengers and crew of the bomb threat would have been deeply worrying and likely caused significant distress and anxiety for the passengers onboard that flight.

Relevant links:

Hoax bomb caller jailed after threatening Mumbai - 9News › National

Man Jailed For Bomb Threat Against Singapore Airlines ... › singapore-airlines-bomb-threat-man...

Hoax bomb threat caller sentenced in Sydney | Australian Federal Police (